My Two Census

Formerly the non-partisan watchdog of the 2010 US Census, and currently an opinion blog that covers all things political, media, foreign policy, globalization, and culture…but sometimes returning to its census/demographics roots.

Letter To The Editor: Fingerprinting Issues Need To Be Addressed

The following letter to the editor represents the opinion of John A. Niotti-Soltesz, CEO of Zerco Systems International Inc. and is in response to pieces that we have recently posted about fingerprinting and security issues that were brought to light before Congress by the Government Accountability Office:

To The Editor:

My name is John A. Niotti-Soltesz, CEO of Zerco Systems International Inc. Zerco is working in conjunction with the largest background check screening company in the world and had submitted a comprehensive and much need solution for fingerprinting that addressed many of the flawed issues and the direction the Census was undertaking in clearing the hundreds of thousands of temp workers for next years Census.  We were just notified that our unsolicited proposal, that was submitted to Census in July 27, 2009 was just rejected.  The reasons were absolutely unfounded and distorted.

I believe Dr. Groves and this administration are going down a path that is going to put the American people at tremendous risk and exposure.   We need your voice to expose a flawed process that violates our personal security and exposes tremendous cost overruns that our tax dollars will pay for.  I have worked with our partner for over 6 months on the comprehensive, cost effective and safe fingerprinting livescan solution. Their response basically said “the Census Bureau has already invested in the infrastructure and supplies to support the collection of fingerprints.”   This response is pure BS.  Their investment will put the American public at significant risk and this administration, eventually, in the hot seat.  My staff had meetings with Census at the end of last year (08) and was instructed to submit a proposal, based on the information and approach we recommended, only to have it shot down with today’s notification. Our proposal was mentioned during questioning of Dr. Groves by Congessman Clay less than two weeks ago in a Committee meeting on the Hill. Dr. Groves had no idea our proposal was with the Census or even under-review at that time. However, Congressman Clay did know that Census [Bureau] had the proposal and had done nothing with it.

For the purpose of time and typing so much more information I have,  I would kindly request that we take a few minutes and talk directly.  I am in the process of notifying my Congressman who wrote to the Director with his concerns we shared long before those concerns were made public recently, and others on the hill.  Again, we need your voice.

Finally, I am aware of the proposal David Allburn submitted to Census.  His proposal was denied at the end of 08.  I pursued, with our teaming partner, a unique and cost effective approach that would have delivered the solution to Census they requested in an RFI they put out approximately 21/2 years ago. That solution requested a Livescan fingerprinting process not ink and cards!   Vendors at the time responded to a ridiculous set of requirements that made it cost prohibitive.  Our approach mitigated this issue.   Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

John A. Niotti-Soltesz, CEO

Zerco Systems International Inc.

Tags: , , , ,

3 Responses to “Letter To The Editor: Fingerprinting Issues Need To Be Addressed”

  1. FactChecker Says:

    It’s all talk. The reports on this website claimed the Census Bureau “might” have hired 200 criminals out of 162,000 people finger printed. All we hear are unhappy bidders complaining about the process used by the Census Bureau but neither of them are specific about how their process was more cost effective or less likely to allow convicted felons to pass through the finger print process.

  2. Ex-IT Says:

    This isn’t any more persuasive than the previous entries. If these whining private companies had gotten a contract (for how much?) would this questionable estimate of the number of criminals be 0.10% instead of 0.12%?

  3. Anonymous CL Says:

    Just thought of something… Some crimes are never solved (and some are never even reported), so there are some criminals who don’t have any criminal record, because they never got caught. So it can never be totally 100.000% perfect at keeping criminals out.