My Two Census

Formerly the non-partisan watchdog of the 2010 US Census, and currently an opinion blog that covers all things political, media, foreign policy, globalization, and culture…but sometimes returning to its census/demographics roots.

Federal Census officials get an earful from local community leaders

H/t to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and the Associated Press for the following:

Days after U.S. Census forms began hitting mailboxes, local religious and government leaders are sounding alarms that St. Louisans will be undercounted thanks to wasteful efforts and poor planning.

The criticism came at a roundtable hosted by the Urban League of Metropolitan St. Louis, part of the federal government’s push to encourage community leaders to promote the decennial head count and get residents to return census forms.

At Wednesday’s roundtable, Josh Wiese, an aide to St. Louis Mayor Francis Slay, complained that the census was using “a cookie-cutter” approach to counting that wouldn’t work in “high-crime, low-education” areas the same way it works in the suburbs.

“If this isn’t done right, we’ll certainly hold the Census Bureau accountable,” Wiese told Cedric Grant, director of the U.S. Commerce Department’s Faith Based and Neighborhood Partnerships program, representing the Census Bureau’s parent agency.

Evan Armstrong, of the St. Louis-based International Institute, said he was frustrated that U.S. citizens are given preference for census field work, even if they don’t speak the language of the refugee or immigrant groups they will be counting.

Both Wiese and St. Louis County planning manager Lori Fiegel brought up the challenges of counting the city’s large Bosnian population. Fiegel said her office had been promised a Bosnian liaison, which never materialized. When a census official said the liaison had, indeed, been provided, Fiegel said no one had told her office about it.

“The Bosnian community is afraid of the government, afraid of the government, afraid of the government,” Wiese said. “Then, on April 1, they’re supposed to trust the government before going back to being afraid of the government again the next day.”

William Siedhoff, director of the St. Louis Department of Human Services, said the city’s own annual census of its homeless population, completed in January, would have to be repeated by census workers because the bureau didn’t respond to the city’s suggestion to partner on the January effort.

David Newburger, from the city’s office on the disabled, said data provided by the bureau to help reach the city’s disabled citizens were not specific enough and should include street names. Grant said privacy issues prevented that specificity.

The contentious atmosphere at the roundtable “was based on past experience and the anticipation that undercounts are going to happen again,” Siedhoff said after the meeting.

Dennis Johnson, the bureau’s regional director, defended the census in an interview, saying the effort could not succeed without community partners.

“Someone looking for the federal government to provide all the tools is not going to reach every corner of the community,” Johnson said. “But working through partners who already have outreach systems is one of the most effective communications vehicles the census has.”

Local complaints mirror national ones. Last year, a string of independent reports from the Government Accountability Office and others found mismanagement and troubling computer failures at the Census Bureau.

The St. Louis area has had a troubled relationship with the census. Since 2003, Slay has successfully challenged annual estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau that portray the city as losing population. The census’s annual estimates are less accurate than its constitutionally mandated decennial efforts.

On Monday, Slay said the failure of one individual to submit a 2010 census form would be equal to $1,300 in lost federal aid each year. That means an undercount of 1,000 people would mean the loss of as much as $13 million between today and the 2020 Census.

About $400 billion in government funding is allocated each year to states, counties and cities based on population. The money goes to about 140 programs, including school lunches, senior citizen services and highway construction.

The census results determine the number of congressional seats received by each state, and population numbers are used to draw boundaries for state legislative districts and city wards.

U.S. Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-St. Louis, is chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees the census. He has said Missouri is among slow-growth states “on the cusp” of losing a congressional seat.

The 2010 forms have been streamlined compared with previous years and include only 10 questions. In early April, census workers will begin visiting homes that have not yet returned a form.

Ministers, especially among African-Americans, are seen as trustworthy sources of information, and the Census Bureau is relying on that relationship to get its message out.

Fourth Ward Alderman Samuel Moore, an elder in the Church of God in Christ denomination who is paying for his own efforts to promote the census, took issue with the bureau’s broad effort to engage religious communities in its outreach.

“I have 110 churches in my ward … and many of them are not taking part in this,” Moore told Grant. “And even those that are, are preaching within the four walls of the church. If we’re depending on the church to bring people to the census, it’s not going to happen.”

But the Rev. Charles Brown, pastor of Mount Airy Missionary Baptist Church in St. Louis, said he knew of 150 Baptist pastors in the St. Louis area who had agreed to promote the census and encourage their flocks to fill out the form.

“We’re doing our part,” Brown said.

Grant said after the roundtable that he understood the frustrations but pointed to the passion of the participants as evidence that the ultimate goal of the census will be met. “This is not a perfect product,” Grant said. “But the word is getting out, and you can see by the discussion around this table today that there’s an urgency to what we’re doing.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses to “Federal Census officials get an earful from local community leaders”

  1. James Coolen Says:

    Mr. Wiese could do more than simply Blame an overwhelmed team of census workers for shortcommings in the process of obtaining accurate counts in parts of St Louis. NewsFlash, Mr Wiese: There are poor & high crime areas in every city across America!

    If Mr. Wiese and Ms Fiegel feel there exists conditions unique to the communities in their city that prevent accurate collection of data, perhaps the adminstration should have been better prepared with ideas on how best to assist with operations within that environment. You need a Bosnian liaison? Then get a few volunteers from their community. Hell, they should feel elated to become a part of the team and be able to contribute to their new found democracy. Be part of the solution to your own problems. Don’t wait until they reach your doorstep, then blame everyone else for tripping on them.
    The Census takes place only every 10 years, and relies largley on moderately trained temporary workers to collect & compile data as accurately as possible. The organizational challenges alone of hiring & training this less than motivated and work force are monumental. Use some common sense! Take it upon yourself to deal with the variables pertaining to your administration’s situation. Stop blaming the system! It can’t possibly adjust for each community. It might not seem fair to Mr Wiese, but in this day and age…what is?
    I believe, generally, the distribution of funds follows the same formulas of wealth & progress that it always has in the past. Those regional areas where the most taxes are collected and are most active in business and industry are naturally going to receive the prioritative focus on economic and infrastructural investment, as they should. Now, more than ever, we need to achieve a high ROI when it comes to dispersing Federal money. SO, If during this 2010 Census count, your concern is about an area devoid of economic opportunity, saturated with drugs & crime, and has a badly deteriorated infrastructure, then your focus for the next nine years should be on revitalizing that area – not with Fed Money, but with money from your own creative state programs!!!! DO something to get something!We can’t keep propping up the tired old and making excuses for our lazy attitudes, sense of entitlement and a lack of willingness to sacrifice for our children’s future. Re-education & a change of attitude might be a good start.

  2. josh Says:

    Since the Post Dispatch article did not elaborate on what we, the City, have done in those communities please let me inform you. Since day one – Feb 2009 – we have communicated and provided the Census Bureau with the local leaders with each of the diverse immigrant and refugee populations in the City of St.Louis for the purposes of promoting the census. We have spoken to and promoted the census to all of the different ethnic groups in their own language using the media that is most applicable to them. We knew from the outset that this specific group would be our hardest to count and we were proactive in utilizing our contacts to make sure the message was there and that they had everything they needed to be part of the census. We identified the problem and created the solution. We then passed that along to the Census and watched it go knowhere, hence me blaming them for doing a less than acceptable job at that point.

    I have every right to blame the government when they cant do their job. The Census Bureau’s job is to count people plain and simple and if they cant do that then they need to be held accountable. Same goes for me and my job.

    FYI – The city and the state were the only two govt agencies to do any kind of outreach into the Bosnian and Hispanic communities for close to a year. I even gave around 300 posters we created in Bosnian and Vietnamese to the local census bureau folks because they had nothing.