My Two Census

Formerly the non-partisan watchdog of the 2010 US Census, and currently an opinion blog that covers all things political, media, foreign policy, globalization, and culture…but sometimes returning to its census/demographics roots.

WSJ: Alternative methods of counting for the Census Bureau

Here’s a great article from the Wall Street Journal…Be careful, otherwise you might end up like William Rickenbacker:

By CARL BIALIK

Even in a mandatory census, there are conscientious objectors.

Completing a census form is required by law, but census takers haven’t been able to get any information from more than 500,000 U.S. households this year. While census evaders theoretically can be fined up to $5,000, in practice they are rarely penalized—none were in 2010 or in 2000—for fear of creating a public backlash.

[NUMBGUY] Eddie Rickenbacker Papers, Auburn University Library Special CollectionsWilliam Rickenbacker was fined $100 for refusing to respond to a 1960 census questionnaire, making him one of the few Americans to ever face a penalty for noncompliance.

Instead, the Census Bureau combines threats of penalties with painstaking follow-up over the phone and in person, including interviews with neighbors of nonresponding households. That approach, backed by rapidly rising spending for advertising and census workers, yields near-complete coverage of the U.S. population.

That balancing act is costly, but it yields better statistics than a voluntary census, statisticians say. Calling a survey mandatory boosts participation significantly, they argue, even when enforcement is limited. That is why some data experts in Canada are assailing the government’s new plan to make many census questions there optional.

But as the 2010 U.S. decennial census winds down, a number of critics say even more reliable demographic data could be obtained at far less cost. They point to a system in some European countries that links personal identification numbers to government records on births, deaths, housing and other characteristics. That allows for an annual census rather than waiting every 10 years, and eliminates much of the error experts say arises when people self-report their information.

“The statistical systems in the Netherlands and Germany are much better than our statistical system, because they have a registration system,” said Kenneth Prewitt, the director of the Census Bureau during the 2000 census and now a professor of public affairs at Columbia University.

The decennial census, mandated by the Constitution, is used to apportion congressional seats. It also determines a lot of federal spending.

The census also needs to come as close as possible to complete coverage of the country so that other surveys, such as election polls, don’t have to.

If, for instance, 12% of voting-age Americans are under age 25, but just 6% of respondents to a political poll are in that age group, then the pollster might count their responses more heavily to make up for the shortage of young respondents.

“It is the basic amino acid of every pollster’s existence,” Jay Leve, founder of the polling company SurveyUSA, said of the census.

If the census were voluntary, researchers and pollsters say that their work would be compromised.

An experiment conducted in 2002 and 2003 in the U.S. demonstrated the potential for a lower response rate from a voluntary survey. When the American Community Survey—a detailed annual poll that replaced the long form on the decennial census—was launched nearly a decade ago, the Census Bureau tested two messages. One said replying was “required by law.” The other told recipients, “you may decline to answer any or all questions.”

The difference was stark. Of those who received the mandatory wording by mail, 59.5% responded. Just 38.8% of those who were told they didn’t have to respond did.

Even with the harsher wording, just three in five households mailed back the survey. The decennial census similarly has seen a decline in mail response rates, from 78% in 1970 to 65% in 1990. That decline prompted the Census Bureau to start spending on advertising and other promotional activities—$278.7 million in 2000, in current dollars, and $370.6 million for this year’s census. That has helped keep mail-back rates steady in 2000 and 2010, but it hasn’t led to an appreciable increase.

Click HERE for the rest of the article.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “WSJ: Alternative methods of counting for the Census Bureau”

  1. Current Resident Says:

    “… you might end up like Eddie Rickenbacker”

    You mean I might become an auto racer and ace fighter pilot, write for an adventure comic strip, and buy an airline and the Indy Speedway?

    He has what to do in this forum’s context with adopted son William, who is routinely cited in articles about Consci-Census Objectors?

    From what little I’ve gathered, it appears the Bureau made an example of William for making a publicized stink of his opinions on government intrusion.

  2. Brooklyn Enum Says:

    Are you still supporting a registration system, or as some might call it, a National ID? How authoritarian, intrusive and anti-American.

    Just think of how much it would cost to administer such a system, and then think of the privacy drawbacks that would inevitably accompany such a draconian database.

  3. Inefficient Census Says:

    Look, I don’t like the gov’t sifting through my information without my knowledge, but think of all the companies (like Spokeo, Intelius and so on) that do while compiling public information. However, as an enumerator, I also felt annoyed by basically badgering people and even being placed in a dangerous situation once or twice.

    Think of it this way: if you didn’t vote, don’t bitch and complain about elected officials. If the Census is going to run the same way in 2020 and someone wants to completely avoid answering any question, then hand them a ticket. Backlash or not, it’ll make someone answer the questionnaire or pay the fine.

    In several ways, even a loosely-compiled database can cut back on the amount of UHEs or vacancies need to be verified. No national ID plan, but something securely under lock and key (and information that won’t be sold afterwards) that can provide a reasonable amount of information without the need to physically visit a household unless necessary.

  4. Former NRFU-RI Says:

    Oh, yeah, handing out tickets for failure to answer nosy questions would REALLY make census workers popular!

    The Constitution requires an actual count for the purpose of establishing congressional districts. Period. We don’t need to be asking what people’s race and ethnicity is, and whether they own or rent, and so on. Nor do we need a national ID card, although the gov’t would love to force that one on us. And they will try, using the pretext of controlling illegal immigration. England tried it with an embedded chip, supposedly “unalterable” and it took a newspaper 12 minutes to clone one and change the data inside the chip, see http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1204641/ .

    Here is a radical idea: if people don’t want to be counted, don’t count them! They get less representation and fewer tax dollars, compared to those who do participate. And this is a problem how?